The reversal of cardiology practices: interventions that were tried in vain http://www.thecdt.org/article/view/2854

The reversal of cardiology practices: interventions that were tried in vain http://www.thecdt.org/article/view/2854

Authors: Vinay Prasad, Adam Cifu

Abstract

Medical reversal happens when new trials—better powered, designed or controlled than predecessors–contradict current standard of care. The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial and CAST study are notable examples of investigations that overturned current practice by demonstrating that these interventions offered no survival benefits. In this mini-review, we summarize our experience reviewing a decade of original articles in the New England Journal of Medicine with an eye towards investigations that reversed cardiology practice. From the management of arrhythmias to lipids to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and finally, hemodynamics, reversals in the cardiology literature cover a broad set of practices. These reversals are instructive in that many of the therapies overturned were widely adopted and based on either sound physiologic reasoning or observational trials.

One response to “The reversal of cardiology practices: interventions that were tried in vain http://www.thecdt.org/article/view/2854

  1. check also: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23871230
    A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: